B1.1.2 Governance à
Operating Framework à
Process of committee formation
Rating
|
||
A
|
Not Demonstrated
|
No specific committee
formation process, no documentation
There are no or almost negligible signs of documentation and
practice of a committee formation process in compliance to the applicable
norms.
|
B
|
Developing
|
Documented committee
formation process, but no compliance
There is a documented committee formation process in compliance
to the applicable norms. But the documented process is not diligently practiced.
|
C
|
Proficient
|
Documented committee
formation process, demonstrated compliance
There is clear evidence of attempts made to define, document and
practice a committee formation process in compliance to the applicable norms.
Records of committee re-formation are
readily available for reference.There is lack of awareness among
committee members regarding the process, and there are no attempts made to
evaluate the effectiveness of the process.
|
D
|
Accomplished
|
Defined, documented, and
thoroughly practiced committee formation process
The committee formation process is in compliance to the
applicable norms, and properly documented; documents are made available to
stakeholders and thoroughly practiced. Members are very well aware of the
selection/ nomination criteria, tenures, etc. There is a mechanism for continuous improvement in the process through
periodic internal and external evaluation of the effectiveness, followed by
revisions.
|
E
|
Distinguished
|
Documented committee
formation process, complete compliance, thorough awareness, multi-layered process
The committee formation process is properly documented; process
documents are made available to stakeholders and the process thoroughly
practiced. The committee formation process is well planned and futuristic to
ensure better performance (Partial dissolution, differential tenures, etc.), and
has been successfully showcased to other schools.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment