B1.1.3

B1.1.3   Governance à Operating Framework à Process of committee working

Rating
A	Not Demonstrated	No clear definition and delegation  of roles and responsibilities There are no or almost negligible signs of attempts made for an organized working style. Roles of individual members are not defined and delegated.
B	Developing	Responsibilities are defined for the members collectively but not delegated individually Attempts are made to define responsibilities, but delegation is not done for every member. Need to increase awareness of responsibilities and to monitor responsibilities.
C	Proficient	Clearly defined, delegated, and monitored roles and responsibilities, proper awareness about responsibilities There is clear evidence of attempts made to define and delegate responsibilities. There is proper awareness about individual responsibilities, and a monitoring system to track the fulfillment of responsibilities. Need to have a proper system of performance evaluation, and to use the feedback for further improvement in individual and group functionality.
D	Accomplished	Defined, delegated, and monitored roles and responsibilities, good awareness, proper system of performance evaluation Individual and collective roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and delegated(by setting up sub-committees/or small working groups, etc).Members have clear understanding of their responsibilities. Responsibilities are continuously monitored. Performance evaluation of each member by himself/herself and by the committee, and implementation of improvement actions based on feedback are fully evident.
E	Distinguished	Defined, delegated, and monitored roles and responsibilities, thorough awareness, proactive and futuristic mode of working, effective performance evaluation and clearly visible progress tracks The committee follows a well advanced and futuristic mode of working where the members show a proactive approach towards the fulfillment of their individual and collective responsibilities. Committee understands the importance of feedback given during frequent internal performance evaluation as well as timely scheduled external evaluation. Efforts in tracking the gap and subsequent improvement through implementation of actions based on feedback are clearly visible. Demonstrated continuous improvement in committee’s working is the result of effectively used performance evaluation system. Successful efforts have been made to showcase the innovative working style of the committee to wider community.