B1.3.2

B1.3.2   Governance àSupervision of OperationsàNature of committee’s supervision

Rating
A	Not Demonstrated	No supervision by committee over school level operations Committee’s School Supervision Reports show no or almost negligible signs of committee’s efforts to check the infrastructure and facilities, the school environment, and identify the staff’s requirements during school visits.
B	Developing	Supervision of only some basic aspects of school operation  The SMC members make observations about some basic facilities but no proper documentation for further action.
C	Proficient	Supervision of all the major school level operations, but more of quantitative checks School Supervision reports give clear indications of SMC’s efforts to check infrastructure and facilities, and the efforts made to identify the staff’s requirements during school visits.
D	Accomplished	Supervision more qualitative, and all inclusive, but further actions and follow up system not effective It is fully evident that SMC checks the adequacy, condition, cleanliness and appearance of infrastructure and facilities, evaluates the inclusiveness and psycho-social comfort of the school environment, and tries to identify the staff’s requirements during school visits. Continuous efforts to refine the supervision practices based on internal and external feedbacks.
E	Distinguished	Qualitative and all inclusive supervision, identified action plans and strong follow up The school visit report’s content reflects the quality of SMC’s supervision visits in terms of thorough planning, proper conduct, use of diverse and reliable methods for data collection, coverage of all the important school operational areas, proper documentation and analysis, and detailed action plans with clearly allocated responsibilities, continuous follow up to ensure the implementation of action plans. Commendable efforts have been made to showcase the school supervision best practices to other schools.